Election #1: For the Candidates

This listing helps us understand how candidates should act, and how we as voters should expect them to campaign in an acceptable fashion.

Almost three weeks since the official start of the campaign, what have we seen so far? We have seen candidates arguing against each other. We have heard them during the PiliPinas Debates. But have we seen them talking about their programs? Have we heard them presenting their vision for the country?

Ninety days of the campaign is both long and short—long, that it may cause physical and mental stress; short, that candidates have to go around the country to convince the voters. Given various constraints, candidates must be strategic. Below is a non-exhaustive listing of points I thought candidates might consider. Of course, they already have their respective strategies. What I have here is more of a prescriptive (or normative?) list.

1. Candidates should use their strengths, take advantage of their strong points. This will make them look even stronger. Are they good at speaking, personal (one-on-one) campaigning? Are they good at issues? They must show this strength and capitalise on them.

2. Also, candidates have three tasks: maintain the base, convert the following of others, and sway the undecided. Candidates already have a following. The first order of business is to maintain that following. Next, they must be able to convince those who are already supporting another candidate to be converted. This is essential. The target of campaigns is not those who you know are voting for you. Thus, it is also important to talk to those who are undecided. Once swayed to your favour, keep them within your influence.

3. Candidates should not make very broad promises. They should avoid too specific ones as well. They might be caught by vagueness or details. Vague promises may sound like motherhood statements. Voters today can very well notice if they are fooled by the candidates. Empty promises will not hold water. But giving too much detail can also work against the candidate.

4. Candidates may challenge fellow candidates, but it must be at the issue-level. Personal attacks might be useful, but not as desirable. The usual way of doing campaign is by criticising your opponents. This might work, but it does not paint the candidate in good light. The positive campaign should still be the most preferred way.

5. Badmouthing other candidates is a big no-no. Candidates must focus on their agenda. Avoid giving incriminating statements. For an issue-based election campaign to be sustained, candidates must focus on their agenda. What do they want to do? What is their vision? Name-calling and trash talking will not bring them far. It can also create possible deflection from the current followers.

6. Goals of candidates are two-staged: first, win the elections; second, fulfill election promises. If only one of two then problems may arise. Elections do not end after the proclamation of candidates. Candidates must be conscious of the fact that they have to deliver their promises. People are likely to demand more accountability from the candidates than before.

7. Candidates should avoid dancing, singing, or performing during campaign sorties. They are supposed to showcase what they can do in office. Elections is not an entertainment show. It is the means by which the people select their leaders. Thus, we must demand from the candidates: What can you do if elected? Dancing, singing, or performing on stage is not part of their job once elected.

8. Candidates are expected to be clean. They should not engage in illegal activities like drug pushing. Narco-politics has no place here. It is common knowledge that candidates spend a lot of money during campaign season. But that should not force them into dealing with drug lords and gamblers in order to have funding for elections. If they come clean, they become a much better option that those who entertain business and sometimes illegal interests.

9. The local network works. Candidates should focus on creating and maintaining networks to ensure victory, hopefully without resorting to violence. Local is the way to go. If a candidate has connections down at the sitio and barangay levels, victory is not impossible to achieve. In fact, many politicians are taking advantage of their local networks to win national positions.

10. Candidates should know the job they want to be elected to. The job of a president is different from a senator, a mayor, or a councilor. This is one of the most important items in this list. Candidates must be aware that they are running for a position in the executive or legislative branches. Otherwise, the candidate may be confused on what has to be done, what can be done, and what was promised. This can also help them configure their plans according to what they are expected to do.

Again, this list is not exhaustive. Others may even say that the contents of the list are very obvious. Obvious they may be, it is still important to note and write them down. Also, the contents are also subject to disputes. The statements are quite generic, as it tries to prescribe a certain behaviour among candidates.

For whatever its worth, I hope this listing helps us understand how candidates should act, and how we as voters should expect them to campaign in an acceptable fashion.

Image: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/files/2013/05/2013-election.jpg


In its simple yet impactful ways, OTWOL has carried us to a roller-coaster of emotions every night, within a single episode.

I am not a fan of teleseryes.

I usually go home around 5 pm. If I have classes until 5:30 pm, I go home around 6 pm. The difficulty of riding a jeep in UP, a train in MRT, and another jeep in Mandaluyong during rush hours would result to longer travel time. I usually arrive home around 8 to 8:30 pm. Upon arrival, I go up in my room, finish some school work, and then go down to eat. This is around 9 to 9:30 pm.

The TV is always on. People at home watch Kapamilya shows starting from TV Patrol until the last teleserye before Boy Abunda’s show. Whenever I eat dinner, I always chance upon On The Wings Of Love (OTWOL). It was as if the serye was made to accompany me during dinner. However, this was not my initial thought on OTWOL.

When they were advertising this new show featuring James Reid and Nadine Lustre, my first reaction was: ‘They’re going to have another teenage-loveteam-romance teleserye’. I dismissed OTWOL as one of those usuals, which take popular love teams to lead only for it to rate while the story is less than desirable. That is so pessimistic of me.

But as I eat dinner while watching OTWOL, as the story was revealed, I was wrong. From that first scene in the street corner in San Francisco to the last scene in today’s episode, I have seen them. Why? Because it went beyond my expectation. The story was not the usual after all. In fact, on certain occasions, I see how OTWOL tries to be relevant to the plight of certain sectors of our society, primarily of the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW).

In my limited exposure to migration research, I learned the experiences of the OFWs especially during times of crisis. Being an OFW is not an easy life. The hardship one has to endure, particularly being away from one’s family, seems unimaginable, but is real and happening. Leah’s American dream is something most Filipinos can relate with. Clark’s industry in order for him to send money for his siblings is not foreign to us. These simple manifestations of OFWs life abroad reflect how OTWOL is sensitive to the nature of most Filipino families today—one that has, at least, a member of the family away to work and stabilize the family’s economic well-being.

Still on OFWs, one memorable scene I remember from OTWOL is when Leah was arranging her balikbayan box to be sent to her family. Clark remarked that balikbayan boxes are now checked and may take time before they reach their destinations. This was during the time when the Bureau of Customs has been on the hot seat for its (in)actions regarding balikbayan boxes. OTWOL was successful in its attempt to bring the issues of the day to its audience without trying too hard.

OTWOL is also sensitive to its audience. During the bridal shower for Leah, Clark wore a police uniform. This resulted in various reactions in the social media, particularly within the uniformed sector. Some episodes later, OTWOL made an apology, still within the context of the show’s story, and again, without trying too hard.

I enjoyed watching OTWOL to the extent that I am able to bring the experiences of characters to my classes, as examples say, whenever I explain concepts and relationships in political sociology and political thought (Of course, only those that apply). I also share stories and reactions with my students who also watch the serye.

There are values that OTWOL imparts to us, like the value of family, of marriage, of friendship, and of love. The line ‘Kung mahal ka, babalikan ka’ and other similar formulations will now be remembered by every OTWOLista as the message of true love, one that does not abandon, but returns and remains. In its simple yet impactful ways, OTWOL has carried us to a roller-coaster of emotions every night, within a single episode.

Finally, OTWOL is not just one of those seryes. It is a brand of its own. It is sui generis. It is the only serye or story that I know that tried to develop all the key and even supporting characters. Each member of the Medina and Olivar families, of Tenement Uno, of Artmart, of Woodlands, has a story to tell and lessons to share. I acknowledge the dedication of the writers, directors, staff, and, of course, the actors in bringing us the best that they can in order to produce the best that we deserve.

I am not a fan of teleseryes, well, except if we are talking about OTWOL. It is sad that OTWOL will end tomorrow. What will I watch now when I eat dinner? There will be no Clark and Leah. But I am also happy that we can and it is possible to have a feel-good, plus drama, plus comedy, plus a life-changing story in one teleserye. I hope to see more in the future. Congratulations, OTWOL team!

Now I must return to work, and check the papers of my students.

Image source: http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u492/DryedKamen/wings-1001.jpg

Some thoughts, again

I had to write this down.

In my life, it is very rare that I feel deep affection towards others. Friends, yes. Family, definitely. Some other lower forms of feelings, yes. But this one, this very moment, I feel something rare, something different—something I might have felt, not the same way as before.

It also happened in a rather strange setup which I have not had a chance to explore before. Never did I imagine this kind of feeling will surface again. Not that I do not like it. I am waiting for it. But the effect is different than expected, and that is usually the case, the ‘as always’.

On the power of words

In one of my book reviews, I have argued that ‘words are powerful tools’ (Go 2014, 117). This is under the presumption that the meanings surrounding every word we utter have an impact both from the speaker, the source of the word and meaning, and the receiver, who in turn tries to make sense of what meaning was made. Of course, we do not really ponder so much everyday normal conversations. There is an assumed language game that both parties subscribe to and, therefore, have a common understanding of words and meanings.

The power of words, however, does not only belong to the speaker, but also to the receiver. The speaker may impose a meaning on a word. And yet, the receiver can create a new meaning different from that of the speaker. The difference I am talking about here is not binary difference. There could be an intersection of meanings, but there is a significant twist or alteration that meaningfully changes the meaning or at least the essence of it. Let me cite some examples.

Instik. Instik has a negative and derogatory connotation. When used, it usually demeans a person who happened to have a Chinese ancestry or ethnicity. Instik, as scholars Hau (2014) and Tan (2007-2013) noted in their works, can be traced to the phrase: ‘Instik viejo, tulo laway’. This refers to the hardworking Chinese migrants in the Philippines, who in their sleep fails to notice their saliva spilling from their mouths. Instik, which originally refers to an uncle or elderly man, has morphed into a term of insult and humiliation.

Bakla. Bakla does not necessarily have a negative meaning, but some people use it in insulting people, usually gay men or males who may have homosexual tendencies. However, bakla is supposed to mean a positive impression, not an insult. According to the UP Diksiyunaryong Filipino, bakla means ‘pagkabighani sa anumang maganda, at lalo pa, bago sa paningin’ (2001, 79). On how the term was used to refer to homosexuals, I am not aware. Another entry in the dictionary already appropriates the word bakla (with a different accent/stress) to its current usage. I am sure there is academic literature available to explain the change in meaning.

Reclaiming and re-appropriation of words and their meanings are usually the courses of action in these cases. If the receivers will take the use of these words differently, i.e., different from the intent of the speaker, and take them positively, then the meaning would change. Instead of being offended by instik or bakla, what the receivers can do is to reclaim the term and alter its meaning. This is a reassertion of power on the part of the receiver. In the case of instik, Chinese should not take offense, but instead reclaim the use of the word. In the first place, it was used to refer to hardworking Chinese migrants. Likewise, bakla can be taken positively. Its original meaning should overpower its current meaning. To be called bakla is to be rendered beautiful.

CSSP Trends presentation

Here is the presentation I gave during CSSP Trends: A Forum on Indigenization of SSP [pdf]. The presentation is entitled ‘Indigenisation of Political Science’. It should not be cited since information provided is limited. For questions, please send an email to jrgo1@up.edu.ph. Thank you.


Almost everyone knows that my eyes are ‘graded’. I started wearing glasses when I was on my first year in college. I had periodically changed my glasses because their grades have appreciated very quickly. For one, studying requires loads of readings. Also, my exposure to computers has added to the entirety of the problem.

Yes, it was a problem. My mother was the one in-charge of the daily expenses and my father for my sisters’ tuition. They both study in privately-owned universities. That said, additional expenses like eyeglasses have to be included in a tight budget. Good thing there were cheap eyeglasses available in malls, though they do not seem to be aesthetically appealing.

A 600-peso pair of eyeglasses was the first I bought. It was on sale; thus, the cheap price. My mother also wears eyeglasses so she knows which ones to pick and buy. There is the cheaper reading glasses, but mine was corrective. So we really had to spend for it. Besides, I do not change mine every month.

I started working as a student assistant as early as my freshman year. I was already earning more than 1,000 pesos per month. I usually use my salary, albeit always delayed, to augment my 50-peso daily allowance. Whenever possible, I also buy second-hand books from a shop in the mall across my university. This is where I also get my funds for my eyeglasses.

Since I was already earning some money, I just tell my mother that I need to change glasses. When I feel week-long headaches, I had my eye checked. Of course, optical shops in malls would advise that I change glasses. One time, I took the frameless type. With regular price, it comes a bit expensive for a college student. Maybe it was by luck that I always catch sales or discounted prices. Within a week, it got broken during a PE session. I had to have it replaced asap. I asked my mother, a rare moment by then, for the replacement of my lenses. From then on I have resolved not to buy the same model until I finish college.

I think I have had over six pairs of glasses in the span of four years in college. In very few occasions did I ask my mother to buy my glasses for me. When I started working full time and earning enough money, I started buying quality, still cheap, glasses. I also made a promise to my mother: that I will buy her her glasses should they need replacement. For almost five years, I have done this for her.

This is my brief story about eyeglasses. Glasses are essential to me. In the kind of work I have, seeing clearly is a must. But there is meaning in every pair that I purchase for myself and for my mother.

Draft: POLSC 196 syllabus (Filipino)

Unibersidad ng Pilipinas
Kolehiyo ng Agham Panlipunan at Pilosopiya
Departamento ng Agham Pampulitika
Diliman, Lungsod Quezon

Agham Pampulitika 196: Mga Kaisipang Pulitikal sa Pilipinas
Ikalawang Semestre 2014-2015

Jan Robert R Go
Katuwang na Propesor

Ang Agham Pampulitika 196 (Mga Kaisipang Pulitikal sa Pilipinas) ay isang kurso tungkol sa kaisipang pulitikal at konstitusyunal ng mga piling Pilipinong bayani, akademiko, pulitiko, at manunulat. Magsisilbi ito bilang isang paglalagom ng mga ideya sa iba’t ibang yugto ng kasaysayang Pilipino mula sa pananakop ng España hanggang sa kontemporaryong panahon.

Ang kursong ito ay nasa ilalim ng Area V (Teorya at Metolohiyang Pulitikal). Tanging ang mga mag-aaral na nasa ika-apat na antas o may katayuang ‘Magtatapos’ ang pahihintulutang maging kabilang sa kursong ito. Gayundin, inaasahan na ang mga mag-aaral ay nakakuha na at pumasa sa Agham Pampulitika 11 at 14, at Agham Panlipunan 2. Bagama’t hindi opisyal na hinihingi, magandang may kaalaman na ang mag-aaral sa mga ideya, konsepto, at teoryang pulitikal. Kung wala ang mga nabanggit, maaaring humingi ng pahintulot sa guro upang matanggap sa kurso. Ang kurso ay may bigat na 3.00 yunits.

Mga Layunin ng Kurso

May taltong pangunahing layunin ang kursong ito. Ito ay ang mga sumusunod:

  1. Pagbibigay-kaalaman tungkol sa iba’t ibang kaisipang pulitikal sa Pilipinas batay sa mga likha at akda ng piling Pilipino sa iba’t ibang larangan tulad ng akademya, pulitika, at sining. Kasama na rin sa layuning ito ang pagpapatibay ng kakayahang maghambing (i.e. pagkakaiba at pagkakatulad) ng mga mag-aaral ng iba’t ibang kaisipan.
  2. Pagiging pamilyar sa mga katanungan na may kinalaman at/o tungkol sa larangan ng agham pampulitika sa Pilipinas. Layunin rin ng kurso na himukin ang mga mag-aaral na maging kritikal sa mga ideya, mapanuri sa mga teorya, at mapagtanong sa mga konseptong ibinabahagi sa mga babasahing likha at akda. Nais ng kurso na magtanong ang mga mag-aaral tungkol sa katuturan ng mga ideyang ihinahain sa kanila.
  3. Pagbubukas ng kamalayan upang mas mahusay na maipaliwanag kung papaano ang mga kaisipan at katanungang nabanggit ay makabuluhan sa mga institusyon, kilusan, at prosesong matatagpuan sa kasalukuyang lipunang Pilipino.

Mga Lapit sa Kurso

Ang kursong ito ay binuo gamit ang tatlong lapit (approaches) sa pag-aaral ng kaisipang pulitikal. Ito ay ang mga sumusunod:

  1. Ang unang lapit ay may kinalaman sa orihinal na akda (locus classicus) kung saan matatagpuan ang mga ideyang pulitikal. Sa pagbabasa natin ng mga orihinal na isinulat, mas makukuha natin ang nais na iparating ng mga may-akda.
  2. Ang ikalawang lapit ay may kinalaman sa mga interpretasyon at pagtingin ng ibang dalubhasa sa mga orihinal na akda. Sa ganitong paraan, nakikita natin kung papaano binibigyang-saysay ang mga ideyang inihahain sa mga akdang babasahin sa kurso. Ngunit, hindi ibig sabihin na kailangang sumang-ayon tayo sa kanilang interpretasyon o pagtingin.
  3. Ang ikatlo at huling lapit ay kaugnay sa ikatlong layunin ng kurso: ang paghahanap ng kabuluhan. Malaki ang bahaging gagampanan ng mga mag-aaral sa lapit na ito. Sa paraang ito maipapalabas ang kaugnayan ng mga ideyang binitiwan ng mga may-akda sa iba’t ibang panahon sa ating kasalukuyang pamumuhay. Dito, inaasahang maging bukas at kritikal ang mga mag-aaral sa pagsusuri ng mga ideya.

Ang Pagtatasa sa Kurso at mga Patakaran sa Pagmamarka

Ang mga mag-aaral ay mamarkahan batay sa kanilang aktibong pakikilahok sa talakayan at pagsusumite ng iba’t ibang rekisito para sa kursong ito. Tandaan lamang na hindi minamarkahan ang kabuuan ng kaalaman ng mga mag-aaral kundi ang mga isusumite para sa kurso. Ang mga sumusunod ang mga pangunahing batayan ng pagmamarka sa kursong ito, kasama ang paglalarawan sa kalikasan at bigat ng bawat rekisito:

Dalawang (2) mahabang pagsusulit o iuuwing sanaysay (40%)
Batay sa mapagkakasunduan ng mga mag-aaral, ang lahat ay kinakailangan kumuha o magsumite ng dalawang mahabang pagsusulit o iuuwing sanaysay. Ang bawat isa ay may bigat na dalawampung bahagdan (20%) o apat na pung bahagdan sa kabuuan (40%). Ang mga pagsusulit ay sa anyong sanaysay na tatasa sa lawak at lalim ng kaalaman ng bawat mag-aaral tungkol sa mga saklaw na paksa. Kung ang pipiliin naman ay iuuwing sanaysay, may isa o dalawang katanungan na dapat sagutin ang mga mag-aaral sa loob ng dalawampu’t apat na oras. Ang iba pang mga detalye ay ipaliliwanag sa klase ng guro.

Pinahabang sanaysay (20%)
Ang bawat isang mag-aaral ay kinakailangang magsumite ng isang pinahabang sanaysay sa pagtatapos ng kurso. Magbibigay ng isang tanong ang guro na magiging paksa ng sanaysay. Ang bawat sanaysay ay mayroon dapat hindi bababa sa 2500 ngunit hindi tataas sa 3000 salita. Ang katanungan para sa sanaysay at iba pang mga detalye ay ipaliliwanag sa klase ng guro. Ito ay mag bigat na dalawampung bahagdan.

Paglalahad ng Paksa (15%)
Bubuo ng hindi hihigit sa labinlimang pares ang mga mag-aaral. Ang bawat pares ay pipili ng isang may-akda/paksang ilalahad sa buong klase. Kasama sa paglalahad ay ang mga sumusunod: (1) maikling talambuhay ng may-akda, (2) tatlo hanggang limang mahahalagang kaisipan mula sa may-akda, at (3) pagsusuri sa mga kaisipang pinili. Ito ay dapat gawin sa loob ng 45 minuto. Ang nalalabing oras ay gagamitin sa talakayan. Maaaring magbigay ng buod ng paglalahad na ipamamahagi sa mga kamag-aral. Hindi kinakailangang umasa sa mga kagamitang elektroniko sa paglalahad. Mas maganda kung magiging malikhain ang bawat pares. Ang pagpili ng paksa at iba pang mga detalye ay ipaliliwanag sa klase ng guro. Ito ay mag bigat na labinlimang bahagdan.

Malikhaing Proyekto (15%)
Dahil hindi madalas buksan ang kurso sa kaisipang pulitikal sa Pilipinas, iilan lamang ang may kaalaman tungkol dito. Upang mapalaganap ang kaalaman sa paksa ng kurso, ang mga mag-aaral ay maaaring bumuo ng dalawa hanggang tatlong pangkat na gagawa ng isang proyekto. Kung mapagkaisahan na buong klase ang gagawa ng isang proyekto, ito ay maaari rin. Ang proyekto ay maaaring eksibit, poster, talakayan, blog, page, o kung anumang mapagkasunduan ng mga pangkat o ng buong klase. Ang iba pang mga detalye ay ipaliliwanag sa klase ng guro. Ito ay mag bigat na labinlimang bahagdan.

Pakikilahok sa Talakayan (10%)
Ang bawat mag-aaral ay inaasahang makikilahok ng aktibo sa talakayan sa klase. Upang maging maganda ang daloy ng talakayan, inaasahang nagbasa ang bawat isa kahit hindi sila ang nakatalaga upang maglahad sa klase. Pagkatapos ng bawat paglalahad, ang guro ay mangangalap ng mga tanong na pag-uusapan ng lahat. Maaari ring magkaroon ng iba’t ibang uri ng ugnayan sa klase tulad ng debate, panayam, at iba pa. Hindi garantiya ang pagsasalita sa klase upang magkaroon ng puntos. Kailangang may laman at saysay ang mga sagot. Ito ay mag bigat na sampung bahagdan.